As previously reported, on Thursday, March 9th, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) hosted a forum on the consumer implications of recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain technologies. This is the second of two entries on the March 9th FinTech Forum and focuses on the discussions surrounding blockchain technologies, in which panelists reflected on the nascent stage of the technology, industry representatives expressed confusion over the applicability of current regulation, and regulators expressed a lack of clarity over jurisdictional questions.
On Thursday, March 9th, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) hosted a forum on the consumer implications of recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain technologies. The FTC acknowledged the benefits of technological developments in AI and blockchain technologies, but stressed that advancements in these technologies must be coupled with an awareness of and active engagement in identifying and minimizing associated risks. This blog post focuses on the AI discussion, which addressed how the values of privacy, autonomy, and fairness are affected by the advent of AI systems as well as how to ensure safety and security in the development and deployment of individual and connected AI systems.
The FTC today announced a request for public comment on the Standards for Safeguarding Consumer Information Rule. The FTC promulgated the Safeguards Rule in 2002, implementing Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act , which required federal agencies to establish standards for the administrative, technical, and physical safeguards employed by financial institutions for certain information. In addition to general requests for comment, the FTC requested that five specific issues be addressed, which we have outlined below. Comments are due by November 7, 2016.
On March 2, 2016, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced its first data security enforcement action in the form of a Consent Order with online payment platform Dwolla, Inc. The 5 year Consent Order is based on CFPB allegations that Dwolla engaged in deceptive acts and practices by misrepresenting to consumers that it had “reasonable and appropriate data security practices.” Dwolla neither admitted nor denied that it engaged in data security misrepresentations. The CFPB fined Dwolla $100,000, enjoined it from making further misrepresentations, and is requiring that it develop a written, comprehensive data security program, designate a person responsible for the program, provide employee training, conduct risk assessments, and undergo independent third party audits annually, among other things. The CFPB also places primary responsibility for compliance with the Consent Order on Dwolla’s board of directors.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has finalized a proposed rule that will eliminate the need for certain financial institutions to mail annual privacy notices to their customers, so long as the institutions publish their privacy notices online and engage only in limited sharing of customer information.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is exploring how consumers—particularly members of economically vulnerable and underserved communities—are using mobile technology to access financial services and manage personal finances. In a Request for Information announced earlier this week, the CFPB notes that a large percentage of unbanked and underbanked consumers, many of whom are low-income, have access to mobile phones, a significant number of which are smartphones, and that accessing financial products, services, and financial management tools via mobile devices has the potential to empower consumers to take more control over their financial lives, to increase savings and reduce debt.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has issued a proposed rule that would eliminate the requirement for banks and other financial institutions subject to CFPB jurisdiction to deliver an annual privacy notice to their customers, provided the institutions take certain privacy-protective measures. The CFPB proposal demonstrates that the agency is following up on its 2011 streamlining initiative, in which it solicited comment on possible alternatives to delivering the annual privacy notice, and recognizes at least to some extent the online world that most consumers now embrace
As part of its 2014 Spring Privacy Series, the Federal Trade Commission in March held a seminar to examine alternative scoring products and the possible benefits and risks of their growing use. During the seminar, FTC attorneys Katherine Armstrong and Andrea Arias of the Division of Privacy and Identity Protection moderated a panel discussion between various stakeholders that included public interest groups, the data industry, and academics.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has issued guidance for CFTC-regulated financial institutions on compliance with the security safeguards provisions of Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. In a Staff Advisory, the CFTC recommends that futures commission merchants, commodity trading advisors, commodity pool operators, introducing brokers, retail foreign exchange dealers, swap dealers, and major swap participants implement certain best practices to meet their obligations under GLBA, as well as the CFTC’s GLBA regulations at 17 C.F.R. Part 160, to adopt policies and procedures that address administrative, technical and physical safeguards for the protection of customer records and information.
Under a new regulation on the notification of personal data breaches, providers of publicly available electronic communication services must provide notices to authorities of breaches within 24 hours. If the provider lacks full information about the data breach, a preliminary notice is required, with a subsequent notification within 3 days after the initial notification. The subscribers […]
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) recently issued a revised guidance (“Guide”) on the Red Flags Rule (“Rule”) (see “Fighting Identity Theft with the Red Flags Rule: A How-To Guide for Business”). The Red Flags Rule requires certain businesses to develop, implement and administer an identity theft protection program. The purpose of this Guide is to […]
There has been an explosion in the number and variety of mobile payment services available to consumers in the last couple of years, with new innovations and players growing exponentially. The release of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) March 8, 2013 staff report, “Paper, Plastic… or Mobile? An FTC Workshop on Mobile Payments,” indicates the potential […]
The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) has released proposed guidance on the use of social media by financial institutions, including banks, credit unions, and non-bank entities supervised by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The proposed “Social Media: Consumer Compliance Risk Management Guidance” (“Proposed Guidance”) defines “social media” broadly to including micro-blogging sites (like Google […]
The FTC has issued an interim final rule to amend the Identity Theft “Red Flags Rule,” which requires certain “financial institutions” and “creditors” to develop and implement a written identity theft prevention program to identity, detect, and respond to possible incidents of identity theft. The interim rule amendment conforms the Red Flag’s Rule’s definition of […]
On October 13 the Division of Corporate Finance at the US Securities and Exchange Commission issued a Disclosure Guidance that for the first time advises registrants — public companies — to evaluate their cybersecurity risks and, if deemed material, to disclose such risks to investors. This Guidance is likely to lead to public companies performing formal and detailed assessments of the cybersecurity risks, and may lead to shareholder litigation following data security breaches with claims that a company failed to perform the assessment and disclose the risks recommended in the Guidance for complaince with securities disclosure laws.
A financial services industry group recently released guidance on managing the risks associated with using social media such as Facebook and Twitter. The guidance, titled “Social Media Risks and Mitigation,” was released this week by BITS, a division of the Financial Services Roundtable, which represents 100 of the largest financial services companies. The guidance includes tips on managing numerous concerns specific to financial institutions, which are increasingly using social media in their marketing and customer relationship activities.
This blog entry provides a summary of the Hogan Lovells Chronicle of Data Protection’s recent coverage of legal developments regarding social media.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced yesterday that three former executives of GunnAllen Financial, Inc., a Tampa-based broker-dealer, agreed to settle charges that they had violated Regulation S-P by failing to protect confidential information about their customers. This action marked the first time that the SEC had assessed financial penalties against individuals charged solely with violations of Regulation S-P, which requires broker-dealers, investment advisers, and other financial institutions under the SEC’s jurisdiction to protect their customers’ nonpublic personal information and to provide their customers the right to opt out of having their information shared with unaffiliated third parties.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has dismissed as moot a lawsuit challenging the applicability to lawyers of the “Red Flags Rule,” which requires financial institutions and creditors to implement identity theft prevention programs. The organized Bar had challenged the applicability of the Rule to lawyers and had won in the lower court. Since the Red Flag Clarification Act recently passed by Congress would exempt most lawyers from coverage under the Rule, the Court found that litigation no longer is necessary or appropriate.
Comments are due December 29th on a proposal that would require banks and money transmitters to report information to the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) regarding international fund transfers, including the Social Security numbers of individuals that send or receive such funds.
On October 27, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued proposed privacy and data security rules under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Ninth Circuit recently reversed and remanded a district court denial of class certification in a FACTA case, making it easier for class certification even where there was disproportionality between the potential liability and the actual harm suffered, where the potential damages were huge and where defendant engaged in good faith compliance.
On September 15th, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) issued guidance urging banks under its supervision to ensure that they have robust written policies and procedures for the erasure or destruction of sensitive or confidential information stored in office equipment.
On July 1, 2010, final regulations will go into effect that impose new obligations on entities that furnish information about individuals (“data furnishers”) to consumer reporting agencies (“CRAs”) for use in reports about those individuals. These regulations require data furnishers to institute reasonable policies and procedures that (1) ensure the accuracy and integrity of furnished information and (2) allow individuals to formally dispute the correctness of certain information that is furnished about them to CRAs directly with the data furnisher.